once again the tribunal have showed their consistency and fairness by rubbing out a guy for 2 matches for swearing when he went out while the boston strangler gets the all clear
Exactly, I'm not saying rob doesn't deserve 2 games for a second offence but when a bloke drops a stone cold stunner on someone at arvo tea it's a joke
Exactly, I'm not saying rob doesn't deserve 2 games for a second offence but when a bloke drops a stone cold stunner on someone at arvo tea it's a joke
very true but when the bloke has had it coming to him for 10 years and deserves it then i think he should be let off !!
__________________
Brick Top: Do you know what "nemesis" means? A righteous infliction of retribution manifested by an appropriate agent. Personified in this case by an 'orrible carnt... me.
Exactly, I'm not saying rob doesn't deserve 2 games for a second offence but when a bloke drops a stone cold stunner on someone at arvo tea it's a joke
very true but when the bloke has had it coming to him for 10 years and deserves it then i think he should be let off !!
There have been some beltas but this may be the most ridiculous reply in forum history.
First of all, the bloke has been wrongly accused for 10 years, which the real offender has clearly made known.
Secondly, if you think the bloke should be let off for those actions, you clearly have lost the plot.....
I really hope the two exclamation marks at the end of your post note sarcasm.