Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: New points system
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
New points system
Permalink Closed


Anyone got any feedback from the DDCA meeting that was held to discuss the new proposed points system?



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 347
Date:
Permalink Closed

Couldn't make it but looks like the DDCA are struggling for their 2/3's majority at this stage. So much for it being an absolute definite for next season.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 3187
Date:
Permalink Closed

How are clubs meant to know who they can or can't recruit when this rule is yet to be decided?

__________________

sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

Why are they struggling to get clubs to agree to it? One minute clubs are complaining that other clubs are cheating the cap, and then when the DDCA try to fix this problem clubs are not supportive. is the new system to complicated.   



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 3187
Date:
Permalink Closed

They'd wanna sort it out quick smart.........

__________________



Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

prince mark wrote:

How are clubs meant to know who they can or can't recruit when this rule is yet to be decided?





Exactly prince. Its not a worry for us but it would be for other clubs i'd say.

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!



Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

there is only 1 level playing field possible. there is no playing field. simple.

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

slocs wrote:

there is only 1 level playing field possible. there is no playing field. simple.



can you explain further pls slocs?

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

open slather is equal to everybody. any other rule would have it's variables.

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

so what happens when sscc money drys up and you cant pay out the big bucks? do you think it would be fair then?

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

what has sscc got to do with it?

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

slocs wrote:

what has sscc got to do with it?



its just a question.

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

so was mine

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

are you not going to answer?

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

my solution has nothing to do with sscc.

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

So you would have the same view about it being open slather if you played at a club that did not have the same revenue income as sscc?



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 420
Date:
Permalink Closed

If they are after equality IMO the points system does not offer it. It puts no limit on the amount of recruits you can get or how much you can spend. It only limits where you can source these recruits.

If club A can only afford 1-2 recruits, but cashed up club B can afford as many as they want this system does not level off the playing field at all.

Under the example given, a club can do the following:

Start 5, 1 point players (taking into account the extra points and the back dating this is easily achieved).
Recruit an overseas player
Recruit the best bowler from Premier ones
Recruit the best bat from Sub District ones
Recruit the best bowler and the best bat from WGCA
Recruit the best All rounder from another DDCA club

All this and still fall under the 23 points.......

Under test conditions no club went over the points in the last two seasons

So, why have it at all ? Why not just wipe Rule 7 ?

The one thing this does is makes you have 5 players who have been loyal to your club. If all of your juniors talented enough to play Turf 1 decide to go to District, too bad !

(Awesome news for hackers in the 2's like me, I might get a gig with the big boys).

If the anecdotal evidence suggests its basically been wiped in the last few years anyway, and clearly the points system doesn't equal equality as mentioned above what is all this trouble going to achieve ?!

Discuss.

__________________

Not as drunk as Beav....................



Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

sir wrote:

 

So you would have the same view about it being open slather if you played at a club that did not have the same revenue income as sscc?

 




i started playing when sscc were in turf 2. we didn't whinge then and won't start now.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

spot on el pres. it isn't changing a thing.

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

i doubt very much players where getting paid all those years ago or it was very little, its only been over the last 5 to 10 years player payments have been an issue.

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
1 2 312  >  Last»  | Page of 12  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard