So, Fawad Ahmed Khan (to give him his full Pukthun name) has put himself out there again, this time flaunting his religion in what otherwise is supposed t be a secular country. God help Cricket Australia down the track when we have a raft of devout and disparate Christians and their diverse beliefs, as well as Bhuddists, Jews, Hindus, Zorastrians, bona fide Atheists and Calathumpians etc etc in the team all objecting to aspects of various sponsors. The whole sponsorship thing that pays their wages will break down. But that's another story for another day.
I have until now held back on the complete and utter charade under which a desperate Australia has cheapened itself to gain the services of at best an average first class cricketer from another country to bolster its threadbare ranks of spinners. The fact that CA was complicit -- indeed initiated and pushed the Immigration Minister to favourably review an earlier rejection by the normally lenient Refugee Review Tribunal (which says something in itself) of FAK's application for refugee status after initially coming here on a temporary visa to play club cricket -- shows the level of desperation that has made gullible Australia a laughing stock not only in the vast cricketing community in Pakistan but among the huge South Asian cricketing diaspora in Europe, North America and even Australia.
FAK's assertion that he was persecuted and threatened by "religious extremists" because of his "Western" leanings, including support for women's education, fell neatly into the West's perception (indeed reality) of what is happening in that troubled region. Except for one thing: There are tens of millions of other cricketers (including Afghans) playing cricket on maidans (open spaces) in cities, towns and villages across Pakistan. It seems oxymoronic that he is now using tenants of his religion to gain a special privilege. (By the way, did anyone hear anything similar from Usman Khawaja, the first Muslim to play for Aus?)
FAK made his first class debut in 2005 for Abbottabad, a hill station renowned for its many schools, colleges and academies (besides providing a bolthole for the late unlamented OBL). So was FAK the sole voice of reason among the millions playing the game in the region he comes from? If not, be ready to be deluged by a new wave of cricket refugees once Rudd/Abbott stop the boats!
Old school Paki cricketers such as Javid Maindad will be laughing their heads off, knowing that after more than three decades they have seen the circus come a full circle: Once the favourite targets to be vilified by the Aus press, the Lucky Country now has to stoop to contrive to get help in the form of a Paki cricketer so far down the pecking order as to have Buckley's chance of being picked for the country of his birth, a la new chum Yarpie Imran Tahir. (Some reading this forum will be too young to remember Maindad, the guy vilified by the Aus press as an "annoying" SOB. His crime: Having the balls to be the first player from the sub-continent to take it up to the Aussie bully boy "sledging" tactics by cricketers such as the LMC trio. Yet he was cast as the villain, even after DKL disgracefully kicked him on the field and got away with less than a tap with a feather duster. The villain tag is perpetuated by the forever misleading photo of Maindad with bat raised above his head but never used -- as he should have -- in response to being kicked.
FAK, the webs we weave . . . and the one's spun around us.
Just watched a great PR spin production on FAK in the lead up to the first ODI, which exposed his selective adherence to Islamic tenets. We were told a fatwa was issued (by blockheads) against cricket in northern Pakistan. That's a serious directive by the religious ulma, so why didn't he obey this serious, religious-sanctioned directive instead of continuing to play the great game (like millions of other Pakistanis continue to do)? Yet he insists on imposing his views on the question of a beer logo. And then he's pictured holding then PM Gillard's petite hand for an extended period (OK, maybe she was the one holding on, it doesn't matter) when his religion rules that he shouldn't touch another woman (other than his mother, sister, gran etc). Following his religion closely, the only chaste women are those in purdah - closeted behind a full burqua (Hello, the silence from the sisterhood is deafening). What was he doing fraternising with a white woman, who by definition of his Holy book, as interpreted by fanatical blockheads, was dressed in an unchaste manner in public?
The fact is that plenty of good Muslims who love their religion as much as him don't go about flaunting their beliefs out of respect to the ways and "culture" of the lands that have provided them a haven. FAK and his ilk are playing kind hearted and well meaning suckers in the West on a break. These good folk should visit the heart of the Muslim world, the Arabian peninsula (for those who might not know, that's the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Yemen, Oman, the United Arab Emirates and Kuwait) and try and get a bit of reciprocity in cultural or religious ground. There is just one church in that entire sprawling land mass and building any others is strictly voboden.
The spin production showed us FAK and a few other "devout" co-religionist with their prayer mats rolled out on a cricket ground (in Melbourne?) making the incantation, "Allah O Akhbar" (God is Great). This never occurred on a cricket ground when I was growing up in Pakistan. Did that make good Muslims of that era any less devout or deserving of God's blessing? Imagine a group of Christians setting up their pews in a public space in the Arabian peninsula (or most other Muslim countries for that matter) and making a spectacle saying their prayers with the sign of the cross and holding rosary beads? They'd be set upon and stoned as infidels. Visitors to those and other Muslim countries have to strictly follow local rules and customs, with women forced to dress "modestly".
The same do gooders who insist on the separation of the State and religion in the West are usually at the forefront in dissing Western beliefs and customs while bending over backwards to accommodate the most zealous interpretation of a brand of beliefs that regard them as infidels (lost in the translation, "non believer", is the deep venom underlying its use; an infidel is on lower than lowest level of a pig, which is the greatest slight that can be delivered ... and all you non-Muslims reading this fit that category according to the only true believers who see themselves as the new Crusaders of religion.