I got there just after that, he was pretty sore, but by the sounds of it, hes very very lucky thats all he got.
Yeah completely....still wondering how he didn't crack his head open. The ladies got him a Ice pack to whack on his arm and then Bandaged it up for him and like a trooper he continued on to score and had a beer after the game 'a delightful chap'
I was having a beer with your President at the time, seen him tumble, you guys were excellent in the care you gave him. well done.
Now not having a go at anyone........just have a question i would love to get a correct answer for.
Today we had rain hit 57 overs into our game we were well placed at 5-142 with Trav on 65 looking good, we lost 48 mins due to rain. When the rain stopped and we were ready to play the umpires said we lost 13 overs of play so we have 10 overs to bat for our cumpolsury close of innings???????????
Thus giving us 67 overs for our innings which we were not happy about, is that the correct ruling so far. Then when in trying to hit up a score we lost 3 wickets quickly and after we were 8 down as the number 10 batsman walked out to bat the umpires informed us if we get bowled out before the (cc) then Narre get 80 overs next week..............????????? Which we got bowled out in the 65th giving Narre 82 overs total 2 this week and 80 next week.
Have we been jibbed or just a victim of bad circumstances???????
i was told in our game that we could be off for 30mins without loss of overs and then overs would be deducted at 1 over per 4mins after the 30mins had elapsed. So going on what i was told you should have lost 18 mins therefore 4-5 overs only
SS that is my understanding of the rule.........once 30 mins is lost then any time there after is calculated every 3 mins lost is = to 1 over so my understanding was we would of lost 6 overs...........meaning we batted 74 yesterday for the close of play........3 overs next week totaling 77 giving Narre 77 overs as well still allowing 80 overs play next week. What would have happened if we batted our overs of 67........then Narre would have batted 67 next week also losing 13 overs which i don't get.
This might be a bit long but just for Beaver it has to be seeing he won't read the DDCA Rules
DDCA Rule 19.3.3 Compulsory Closure: Loss of More than 30 Minutes but Less than 60 Minutes If the first sides innings is delayed or interrupted for an aggregate of time not exceeding 60 minutes, the compulsory closure provisions in Rule 19.3.1 shall apply, but with a reduced number of overs to be bowled. The reduced number shall be ascertained by deducting from 80 (72) overs the number calculated under Rule 17 in respect of the time lost.
Beaver you lost 48 minutes. Under Rule 17 that means 13 overs for the day's play.
80 minus 13 = 67 overs constitutes a day's play.
But you were all out so no compulsory closure. You only batted 65 overs. So Side 2 faced 2 overs which constituted a day's play.
Rule 19.4.1 No Delay or Interruption to Innings The overs for the second batting sides innings, if not terminated earlier, shall be: (a) The number, including any part over, bowled at the time of compulsory closure of the other sides innings. (b) If the other side is dismissed, the number of overs received by the first batting side and for any further overs possible to a maximum of 80 (72) overs on each day.
This applies to second batting side second day. So they get whatever you didn't bat first day plus 80 overs second day.