Hey Matt, I just wondered whether you had started to change your opinion on Broad of late. I remember we argued a good while back when I said he would be a top international allrounder one day. I think he is starting to come good.
In the last year he has over 50 test wickets at 26 apiece and averaged 25 with the bat for good measure. At 23 I think he is going to keep developing into one of England's best players for some time. Especially now he bowls up at around the 93mph mark.
An exciting talent gooch no doubt, would need to get the average a lot higher to be considered a top all rounder, prob around the 35 to 40 runs. Whats his highest score?
Yeah I think so Matt. The extra yard delivered from 6 foot 6 has definitely taken him up a notch. And yes Mick, he has had several 50s but no hundreds. More likely will end up a bowling alrounder like Johnson.
The Beav and Goofy show again. As soon as England does well they are the greatest ever. Still the worst smelling showerless under performing joint thats exeists...!
__________________
The Hoff is looking for a change of club. Anyone interested please contact my misses as she runs my life and will bargain for the right price.
It didn't include the current game (though you knew that) so yes he got his 50 wickets.
It's close because obviously Johnson is a gun. I'd genuinely go with Broad though. He will likely end up the better player. He's as fast as Johnson already and he hasn't filled out fully yet. Not much in it batting wise. Broad looks more solid but Johnson more destructive.
I'd also throw Graeme Swann in as a very useful alrounder these days. Just get this for his 2009.
As much as i love Mitch i would probably take Broad.......5years age difference massive factor. I find myself agreeing with all of Goochys last post......in saying that i wonder what Mitch & Broad Batting avg would be for the last year?
As much as i love Mitch i would probably take Broad.......5years age difference massive factor. I find myself agreeing with all of Goochys last post......in saying that i wonder what Mitch & Broad Batting avg would be for the last year?
beav you asked who would you prefer now, not who's better for their age
It didn't include the current game (though you knew that) so yes he got his 50 wickets.
It's close because obviously Johnson is a gun. I'd genuinely go with Broad though. He will likely end up the better player. He's as fast as Johnson already and he hasn't filled out fully yet. Not much in it batting wise. Broad looks more solid but Johnson more destructive.
I'd also throw Graeme Swann in as a very useful alrounder these days. Just get this for his 2009.