Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
"The Bloods" Cricket Chat Forum -> DDCA News -> Final Four
Post Info TOPIC: Final Four
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
RE: Final Four
Permalink Closed

outright to buckley?

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

whos in buckley or parky?

__________________
Mr_NoBody


Status: Offline
Posts: 165
Date:
Permalink Closed

2 OLD 2 SLOW wrote:

Bloods gone!!!!!



 what do you mean 2o2s?



__________________
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

dont know who is in but bloods are out. Expect legal action against match fixing

__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

does bruce grobblar play for buckley?

__________________
sheepy


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

i take it that last line was in jest??????

__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)
sheepy


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

damn woof u got in too fast, i meant the line about legal action

__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

sheepy wrote:

i take it that last line was in jest??????


if your talking to me, absolutly not

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
sheepy


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

one minute you saying that buckley and parkfield were right to do it now u wanna take em to court???????? thats ridiculus.


__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

best harry and franks get their story right.

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
Mr_NoBody


Status: Offline
Posts: 165
Date:
Permalink Closed

it is a match fixing, declaring at 0/0 thats fuken bullsh!t.they just didnt want ss in the top 4 end of story

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

sheepy wrote:

one minute you saying that buckley and parkfield were right to do it now u wanna take em to court???????? thats ridiculus.


the club may have said that not 2o2s,

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
sheepy


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

buckley didnt declare at 0/0 to screw sscc, they did it to try and make the 4 themselves. wouldnt have mattered to them who was in 4th spot.


__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

as i said unsporstsman like, thats not a crime though

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

Mr_NoBody wrote:

it is a match fixing, declaring at 0/0 thats fuken bullsh!t.they just didnt want ss in the top 4 end of story


cmon your kidding, you think they did this so sscc wouldnt make it? dont be silly.

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
sheepy


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

not much of a story to get straight sir, 2 umpires there must have been made aware of what was going on. two teams trying to get an outright will be the argument.

__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

in my opinion they went the wrong way about it

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

sheepy wrote:

not much of a story to get straight sir, 2 umpires there must have been made aware of what was going on. two teams trying to get an outright will be the argument.


i would hate for one of them to be taking out of context or something like that.

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
sheepy


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

Not sure if i agree or disagree with what is supposed to have happened but legal action would be a waste of time, wouldnt get through the front door.
does it matter if they declare at 0/0, 0/10? 0/50? where do u draw the line, they had to get 10 points.

__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)
Mr_NoBody


Status: Offline
Posts: 165
Date:
Permalink Closed

sir wrote:

Mr_NoBody wrote:

it is a match fixing, declaring at 0/0 thats fuken bullsh!t.they just didnt want ss in the top 4 end of story


cmon your kidding, you think they did this so sscc wouldnt make it? dont be silly.

 


first why would parkfield declare at 80/8? and then buckley 0/0? it is match fixing sir

 



__________________
«First  <  1 … 8 9 10 11 12 … 22  >  Last»  | Page of 22  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
"The Bloods" Cricket Chat Forum -> DDCA News -> Final Four
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard