Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Final Four


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Final Four
Permalink Closed


sheepy wrote:

one minute you saying that buckley and parkfield were right to do it now u wanna take em to court???????? thats ridiculus.



You said this before when i was clearly giving out info to legal action which was not my actually opinion but what i got told

 



-- Edited by 2 OLD 2 SLOW on Saturday 27th of February 2010 11:22:34 PM

__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT

sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

if there was an agreement made by both clubs to declare etc...... they will be in big trouble.

but if it turns out the parkfield dec, then buckley said , we do to then they will be ok.

-- Edited by sir on Saturday 27th of February 2010 11:10:13 PM

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 165
Date:
Permalink Closed

80/8 keep batting, why declare....you are still 150 odd behind

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

sir wrote:

if there was an agreement made by both clubs to declare etc...... they will be in big trouble.

but if it turns out the parkfield dec, then buckley said , we do to then they will be ok.

-- Edited by sir on Saturday 27th of February 2010 11:10:13 PM



had to of been

 



__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

Mr_NoBody wrote:

80/8 keep batting, why declare....you are still 150 odd behind



because chances are they would not of got them and could not afford to waste the overs.

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 165
Date:
Permalink Closed

sir wrote:

if there was an agreement made by both clubs to declare etc...... they will be in big trouble.




 sir, this is what i heard...parkfield was 80/8 and they declared. this means they wanted to win outright or lose outright...either way its match fixing



__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

Woofa wrote:

sir wrote:

if there was an agreement made by both clubs to declare etc...... they will be in big trouble.

but if it turns out the parkfield dec, then buckley said , we do to then they will be ok.

-- Edited by sir on Saturday 27th of February 2010 11:10:13 PM



had to of been

 



well they will be in trouble,

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

Mr_NoBody wrote:

sir wrote:

if there was an agreement made by both clubs to declare etc...... they will be in big trouble.




 sir, this is what i heard...parkfield was 80/8 and they declared. this means they wanted to win outright or lose outright...either way its match fixing



your a complete idiot

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT



Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

settle down bobby, i wasnt saying u in particular. jesus bit precious arent we?


__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)



Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

sheepy wrote:

settle down bobby, i wasnt saying u in particular. jesus bit precious arent we?



not at all, your comment was just stupid

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT

sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

the way i see it, as i said before , IF THERE WAS AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TWO CLUBS TO DEC THEIR INNINGS CLOSED, THEY ARE IN TROUBLE.

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

whatever, we debate this for 2 hours and you wanna call me a moron over 1 comment that was in response to what the club told you, not what you said.
wanker

__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)



Status: Offline
Posts: 165
Date:
Permalink Closed

why am i an idiot then old bob

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

because you disagree with him mr nobody,


__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)

sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

Mr_NoBody wrote:

sir wrote:

if there was an agreement made by both clubs to declare etc...... they will be in big trouble.




 sir, this is what i heard...parkfield was 80/8 and they declared. this means they wanted to win outright or lose outright...either way its match fixing



get of the hooch

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

Mr_NoBody wrote:

why am i an idiot then old bob



becauce in parfield or buckleys position you would have done the same thing, your just to stupid to realise it

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT



Status: Offline
Posts: 165
Date:
Permalink Closed

well i didnt say anything wrong sheepy, 80/8 parkfield should've finished their innings. if it was a series only between buckley and parkfield then it was all good they both wanted to get a result but here sscc and doves were involved in it big time.

-- Edited by Mr_NoBody on Saturday 27th of February 2010 11:23:36 PM

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

was there not a league official umpiring in that game also? not sure if its relevant or not?

__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)



Status: Offline
Posts: 347
Date:
Permalink Closed

Interesting conversations tonight! Anyone got a rope?

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

well it appears if you disagree with 2o2s that just makes you an idiot or a moron or stupid.


__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)

«First  <  19 10 11 12 1322  >  Last»  | Page of 22  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard