Final Four

2 OLD 2 SLOW · Status: Offline

RE: Final Four

2 OLD 2 SLOW · Status: Offline

Id prob leave me misses if it meant winning another turf1 flag so im prob not the bloke to ask

sir · Status: Offline

you wouldnt have done that max?

Sobers · Status: Offline

sir wrote:

2o2s, honest answer required.

if you were in parks and bucks shoes , what would you have done?

It's Parkfields declaration at 8 down that really doesn't sit right, you wouldn't do it unless you knew the opposition cap was going to declare 0/0, Parkfield on any other day would fight tooth and nail to win the game.

BErnst · Status: Offline

max wrote:

BErnst wrote:

Thank you Max more then happy for you to vent your spline if it makes you feel better.

i think its a bit rich of you coming on here and talking about cricket smarts, i mean come off it mate who are you kidding here ??

did you check out the name of the forum that you started posting on today or did you forget what transpired over the weekend ??

I wrote a long reply and thought about it wonder why bother. You are speaking with a heavy heart through disappointed for your friends and i understand that. I will let you know i wanted SSCC to stay in the 4 and wished BRCC & PCC did not get a outright but it happened so please don't blow up at me.

deadbat · Status: Offline

Sobers wrote:

sir wrote:

2o2s, honest answer required.

if you were in parks and bucks shoes , what would you have done?

It's Parkfields declaration at 8 down that really doesn't sit right, you wouldn't do it unless you knew the opposition cap was going to declare 0/0, Parkfield on any other day would fight tooth and nail to win the game.

They were not going to win the game from that position at tea, and knowing that buckly had to get the outright it makes sense. Buckly was never going to inforce the follow on and logically they would bat for a few overs and delcare or as they did do it at 0/0 meaning a realistic chase for parkfield and no overs lost in changeovers. It was a risk both teams had to take so there is nothing wrong from either captain.
Could only be seen as a contrived result if 1 of the teams had nothing to gain from it.

max · Status: Offline

BErnst wrote:

max wrote:

BErnst wrote:

Thank you Max more then happy for you to vent your spline if it makes you feel better.

i think its a bit rich of you coming on here and talking about cricket smarts, i mean come off it mate who are you kidding here ??

did you check out the name of the forum that you started posting on today or did you forget what transpired over the weekend ??

I wrote a long reply and thought about it wonder why bother. You are speaking with a heavy heart through disappointed for your friends and i understand that. I will let you know i wanted SSCC to stay in the 4 and wished BRCC & PCC did not get a outright but it happened so please don't blow up at me.

your right i apologise

BErnst · Status: Offline

No dramas

sir · Status: Offline

would anyone allow a batsmen to have a runner, but you knew the bloke did not hurt himself during the game, and you only need one wicket to win? and they need 20 to make finals?

-- Edited by sir on Monday 1st of March 2010 02:05:36 PM

2 OLD 2 SLOW · Status: Offline

sir wrote:

would anyone allow a batsmen to have a runner, but you knew the bloke did not hurt himself during the game, and you only need one wicket to win?

no way

max · Status: Offline

sir wrote:

you wouldnt have done that max?

Sir , you are speaking to a bloke that would sell his nans false teeth to win a flag !!

in all seriousness there is a line that got crossed and i wouldnt play my cricket that way, i never have and i never will but hey everyone is entitled to there own opinion's on the issue , no laws/rules were broken but that being said it is pretty poor form, all the clubs that were involved i,d love to know how they would feel if it was them in sscc position ?? its a funny game and what goes around comes around and im sure people will never forget,it will certainly add a bit of spice to the comp next season when those teams meet.

sir · Status: Offline

sir wrote:

would anyone allow a batsmen to have a runner, but you knew the bloke did not hurt himself during the game, and you only need one wicket to win? and they need 20 to make finals?

-- Edited by sir on Monday 1st of March 2010 02:05:36 PM

slight change.

-- Edited by sir on Monday 1st of March 2010 02:06:35 PM

sir · Status: Offline

just wondering max, that all. i was put in that poistion on saturday.

2 OLD 2 SLOW · Status: Offline

sir wrote:

just wondering max, that all. i was put in that poistion on saturday.

Did you give em the runner? hope not

max · Status: Offline

sir wrote:

sir wrote:

would anyone allow a batsmen to have a runner, but you knew the bloke did not hurt himself during the game, and you only need one wicket to win? and they need 20 to make finals?

-- Edited by sir on Monday 1st of March 2010 02:05:36 PM

slight change.

-- Edited by sir on Monday 1st of March 2010 02:06:35 PM

uuuum interesting question it would depend on who they where the club i mean cos if it were mordi or parkfield then not a chance in hell !!

sir · Status: Offline

i did ,

2 OLD 2 SLOW · Status: Offline

and did you win?

sir · Status: Offline

we did.

max · Status: Offline

sir wrote:

we did.

fair play to you mate !!

max · Status: Offline

BErnst wrote:

No dramas

i still think your an imposter though !!