Final Four

BErnst · Status: Offline

RE: Final Four

fathertime · Status: Offline

G Train wrote:

FT, what do you propose the league should've done about it?

What could the DDCA have done...i am not too sure.

If the league say didnt award pts to either team for whatever reason. Then we would be happy and then they, Park and Buckly be miffed at the league and us. The DDCA executive were in a lose lose situation....someone was gonna get there back up.

I and a lot of other people do not agree with what has happened. And i would hope they, the DDCA do something in the off season so something like this ever happens again.

If they don't and say if there's two teams outside of the four at the end of round 10 next season and both are 6 points from 4th. What will stop them both for declaring there 1st inning closed at 0/0 and both teams will play for 10pts.

G Train · Status: Offline

fathertime wrote:

Or is it we are miffed at the leaque for not making a stand....not that they ever do.

So you are saying that the league are in a lose lose situation, you couldn't think of anything yourself yet an hour ago you wrote the above...

BErnst · Status: Offline

G Train wrote:

fathertime wrote:

Or is it we are miffed at the leaque for not making a stand....not that they ever do.

So you are saying that the league are in a lose lose situation, you couldn't think of anything yourself yet an hour ago you wrote the above...

FT do you get your cheap suits from Gtrain, i need one for tonight?

fathertime · Status: Offline

No he has the monopoly on cheap clothing

fathertime · Status: Offline

G Train wrote:

fathertime wrote:

Or is it we are miffed at the leaque for not making a stand....not that they ever do.

So you are saying that the league are in a lose lose situation, you couldn't think of anything yourself yet an hour ago you wrote the above...

Take the whole quote MR PUS FOR BRAINS

fathertime · Status: Offline

fathertime wrote:

fathertime wrote:

end of the day ...the buckley / parkfield are gonna say they've done nothing wrong.....which they have legally. They have done the best for their club. And..... i am sure both teams would've known they'rd we a back lash somewhat....so i give them the due credit...it was a brave call.

One our side...we feel somewhat cheated through no wrong doing of ourselves. More so against the system........

-- Edited by fathertime on Monday 1st of March 2010 03:00:07 PM

more so......who are we really miffed at......Parkfield or Buckley. Or Mordi for been so inept. If the buckley/parkfield game didnt turn out the way it did....would there be questions asked how a team can lose 17 wkts in the day. Or is it we are miffed at the leaque for not making a stand....not that they ever do. I feel really sorry for our boys.....the look in their eyes after the game said it all.

here's the full text Mr Pus for Brains

G Train · Status: Offline

i only used part of it coz the rest was irrelevant. U requoting the whole thing to try and strengthen ur argument, along with the unbelievably childish name calling only proves to everyone how stupid u really are. the fact u even tried to comment on my intelligence, is laughable on its own.

prince mark · Status: Offline

Knock it off Mr Pus for Brains!

G Train · Status: Offline

haha

fathertime · Status: Offline

G Train wrote:

i only used part of it coz the rest was irrelevant. U requoting the whole thing to try and strengthen ur argument, along with the unbelievably childish name calling only proves to everyone how stupid u really are. the fact u even tried to comment on my intelligence, is laughable on its own.

Firstly.....YOU ARE THE KING OF NAME CALLING. .... so that in itself proves what a dim-witted fool you are.

The whole context again for you ..........are the reasons why we/ l are disappontted. Firstly the Buck outright, then Mordi inept batting...then the lack of dissiveness on the night by the DDCA

is that good enough you

-- Edited by fathertime on Monday 1st of March 2010 11:38:21 PM

slocs · Status: Offline

father knock it off

Goochy · Status: Offline

I wish I hadn't read this because it's hard to watch. FT getting humiliated. Someone teach me how to not have read it please!!!

the persuader · Status: Offline

Picked this up off Buckleys forum , nice to see they are gracious winners ....I am sure Big K said they didnt care who's spot in the 4 they took..

"Sent springy south on mad monday with 2 outright wins ,we have ha ha "

-- Edited by the persuader on Tuesday 2nd of March 2010 08:47:52 AM

G Train · Status: Offline

fathertime wrote:

G Train wrote:

i only used part of it coz the rest was irrelevant. U requoting the whole thing to try and strengthen ur argument, along with the unbelievably childish name calling only proves to everyone how stupid u really are. the fact u even tried to comment on my intelligence, is laughable on its own.

Firstly.....YOU ARE THE KING OF NAME CALLING. .... so that in itself proves what a dim-witted fool you are.

The whole context again for you ..........are the reasons why we/ l are disappontted. Firstly the Buck outright, then Mordi inept batting...then the lack of dissiveness on the night by the DDCA

is that good enough you

-- Edited by fathertime on Monday 1st of March 2010 11:38:21 PM

Ahh, no, it's not good enough for me actually.

You are still complaining about a lack of "dissiveness" (whatever that means) from the DDCA, yet you can't come up with a solution yourself and even admitting they were in a lose/lose situation! You make no sense and you are embarrassing your club Rob and i'd quit while your behind if I were you.

fathertime · Status: Offline

G Train wrote:

fathertime wrote:

G Train wrote:

i only used part of it coz the rest was irrelevant. U requoting the whole thing to try and strengthen ur argument, along with the unbelievably childish name calling only proves to everyone how stupid u really are. the fact u even tried to comment on my intelligence, is laughable on its own.

Firstly.....YOU ARE THE KING OF NAME CALLING. .... so that in itself proves what a dim-witted fool you are.

The whole context again for you ..........are the reasons why we/ l are disappontted. Firstly the Buck outright, then Mordi inept batting...then the lack of dissiveness on the night by the DDCA

is that good enough you

-- Edited by fathertime on Monday 1st of March 2010 11:38:21 PM
Ahh, no, it's not good enough for me actually.

You are still complaining about a lack of "dissiveness" (whatever that means) from the DDCA, yet you can't come up with a solution yourself and even admitting they were in a lose/lose situation! You make no sense and you are embarrassing your club Rob and i'd quit while your behind if I were you.

For the last time Train. You asked me what the DDCA should've done. I said i dont know......as whatever they do someone is gonna feel cheated somewhat. They could've not awarded 10 point for bringing the game into disrepute. They could've not allowed 10 points for Buckley as the books did not add up and awarded a tie and Parkfield i beleive then would be in.

You just like argueing for argueing sake dont you?

G Train · Status: Offline

oh my god.

fathertime · Status: Offline

whatever...knew that'd be your reply

Goochy · Status: Offline

Rob you forever go on about people who like arguing, yet you seem to be the common element in said arguments. Goodsey is torturing you yet you hang on in there for more punishment. Just drop it!!

fathertime · Status: Offline

coming from another bloke that only values his opinion and argues with anyone. Goodsys yr King and your the Queen.