Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
"The Bloods" Cricket Chat Forum -> DDCA News -> Final Four
Post Info TOPIC: Final Four
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
RE: Final Four
Permalink Closed

hey bobby, have you spoken to anyone at ss?

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

yeah slocs bout hour ago. still waiting for results. Tried ringing 5 mins ago but no answer, hope thats not a bad sign

__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

I believe the pitch was no different to last week when doveton declare 7 for 270

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

Woofa wrote:

I believe the pitch was no different to last week when doveton declare 7 for 270


we know that, just mordi looking to blame someone or something....

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

Woofa wrote:

I believe the pitch was no different to last week when doveton declare 7 for 270


woof your more 1 eyed than sir

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

2 OLD 2 SLOW wrote:

yeah slocs bout hour ago. still waiting for results. Tried ringing 5 mins ago but no answer, hope thats not a bad sign


so if its a tie and buckley only get 5 points, sscc are in?

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

I said I believe it was the same pitch, I wasn't there

__________________
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

No sir parkfield stay in and doveton replace springy sth

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

Woofa wrote:

No sir parkfield stay in and doveton replace springy sth


arr yes, sorry.

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

sir wrote:

2 OLD 2 SLOW wrote:

yeah slocs bout hour ago. still waiting for results. Tried ringing 5 mins ago but no answer, hope thats not a bad sign


so if its a tie and buckley only get 5 points, sscc are in?

 


nah then parkfield get 5 and their in with the doves outright

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

I cant believe buckley declared at 0-0. why wouldnt you bat for 5 overs (at least) knowing then you wont lose. Parkfield would have chased regardless

__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

In my 28 years playing in the ddca I do not recall a finish to a season like this. Un-believable.



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

2 OLD 2 SLOW wrote:

I cant believe buckley declared at 0-0. why wouldnt you bat for 5 overs (at least) knowing then you wont lose. Parkfield would have chased regardless


what did parkfield have to chase and off how many?

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

Anyone have beavers number? We are meant to be dropping him off 4 kegs tonight

__________________
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

Why can't Buckley inforce the follow on instead of declaring 0-0

__________________
sheepy


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

This gets more bizarre the later the night gets.

Was hoping to get my supercoach team picked tonight but this has killed it.............

__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

Woofa wrote:

Why can't Buckley inforce the follow on instead of declaring 0-0


dont know but may have made an agreement since an outright would get 1 of them in

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

sir wrote:

2 OLD 2 SLOW wrote:

I cant believe buckley declared at 0-0. why wouldnt you bat for 5 overs (at least) knowing then you wont lose. Parkfield would have chased regardless


what did parkfield have to chase and off how many?

 


dont know the overs but they declared at 8-98 so they needed bout 160 but off how many overs i dont know.

Doubt mycricket will be updated tonight

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

2 OLD 2 SLOW wrote:

Woofa wrote:

Why can't Buckley inforce the follow on instead of declaring 0-0


dont know but may have made an agreement since an outright would get 1 of them in

 


surely not?

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
sheepy


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

so parkfield declared early, buckley declared without batting and now at 11:15 we still have no result. This is crazy stuff.

How should sscc feel about teams manufacting an outright result on last day of the season?


-- Edited by sheepy on Saturday 27th of February 2010 10:20:26 PM

__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)
«First  <  1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 22  >  Last»  | Page of 22  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
"The Bloods" Cricket Chat Forum -> DDCA News -> Final Four
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard