Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
"The Bloods" Cricket Chat Forum -> DDCA News -> Final Four
Post Info TOPIC: Final Four
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
RE: Final Four
Permalink Closed

Exactly sheepy, sounds very suss

__________________
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

i know nothing(im just guessing but its what i would do) but it makes sense for parkfield to declare knowing both sides need outright after buckley were easily gonna win on 1st innings

__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

both teams thoughts would've been 6 points isnt enough, so whats there to lose, give both teams a chance and see whos good enough.

sscc should be more pissed at mordi.

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

Woofa wrote:

Exactly sheepy, sounds very suss


not suss but parfield got out played 1st dig and needed to manufacture an outright result, it makes sense

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

sir wrote:

both teams thoughts would've been 6 points isnt enough, so whats there to lose, give both teams a chance and see whos good enough.

sscc should be more pissed at mordi.


spot on

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
sheepy


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

Im not sure if it is suss or if its perfectly ok? Can see valid arguments from both buckley and parkfield but can also see why sscc would being feel a little dirty about it too. Tough situation.

I reckon the forum is gonna go nuts tomorrow though!!!!!!!!!

__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

How silly would Buckley have looked if parkfield passed them by 10 runs all out with 2 overs left and couldn't bat again because they didn't inforce the follow on and declared 0-0

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

sheepy wrote:

Im not sure if it is suss or if its perfectly ok? Can see valid arguments from both buckley and parkfield but can also see why sscc would being feel a little dirty about it too. Tough situation.

I reckon the forum is gonna go nuts tomorrow though!!!!!!!!!


sscc could not feel dirty towards buckley or parkfield, they would've done the same.

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

sir wrote:

sheepy wrote:

Im not sure if it is suss or if its perfectly ok? Can see valid arguments from both buckley and parkfield but can also see why sscc would being feel a little dirty about it too. Tough situation.

I reckon the forum is gonna go nuts tomorrow though!!!!!!!!!


sscc could not feel dirty towards buckley or parkfield, they would've done the same.

 


spot on again

cant believe we consistantly on the same wave lenght Sir. You must have matured

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
sheepy


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

true woofa.

Maybe im wrong here, but if buckley had parkfield in such a bad position would they have needed to make any deals anyway. surely you wrap up the tail, make em follow on and have a crack at em anyway! then you get to bat if required?
We all guessing a bit though hey?

__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

40 in two weeks, time to grow up, haha.

or maybe u have?

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

sheepy wrote:

true woofa.

Maybe im wrong here, but if buckley had parkfield in such a bad position would they have needed to make any deals anyway. surely you wrap up the tail, make em follow on and have a crack at em anyway! then you get to bat if required?
We all guessing a bit though hey?


this is where the deal comes in(still guessing). Lets both declare and 1 of us will make it

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

2 OLD 2 SLOW wrote:

sheepy wrote:

true woofa.

Maybe im wrong here, but if buckley had parkfield in such a bad position would they have needed to make any deals anyway. surely you wrap up the tail, make em follow on and have a crack at em anyway! then you get to bat if required?
We all guessing a bit though hey?


this is where the deal comes in(still guessing). Lets both declare and 1 of us will make it

 


is that wrong? is that in the spirit of the game? im not saying its right or wrong.

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

Was Andrew O keef the umpire

__________________
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

Unsporstsman like I would say sir

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

Woofa wrote:

Unsporstsman like I would say sir


why?  



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

sir wrote:

2 OLD 2 SLOW wrote:

 

sheepy wrote:

true woofa.

Maybe im wrong here, but if buckley had parkfield in such a bad position would they have needed to make any deals anyway. surely you wrap up the tail, make em follow on and have a crack at em anyway! then you get to bat if required?
We all guessing a bit though hey?


this is where the deal comes in(still guessing). Lets both declare and 1 of us will make it

 


is that wrong? is that in the spirit of the game? im not saying its right or wrong.

 


Id prob leave my misses if it meant winning a turf1 flag so im prob the wrong bloke to ask

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

Woofa wrote:

Unsporstsman like I would say sir


No way, any club would & should do what ever it takes to play finals.

 



__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

agree to disagree, doveton could have struck a deal with keysborough in rd3 and im sure alot of other games this year could have ended the same way

__________________
2 OLD 2 SLOW


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

Bloods gone!!!!!

__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT
«First  <  1 … 7 8 9 10 11 … 22  >  Last»  | Page of 22  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
"The Bloods" Cricket Chat Forum -> DDCA News -> Final Four
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard