We were in deep discussion with Dennis Denuto said it came under the Mabo claus.

fathertime wrote:

---

i know what you meant Brett ...i was just been a smartass.

And no i do not agree with you. It may seem to outsiders that we are taking the high moral ground and people again from outside beleive we would've done the same thing if in the same posistion.....wrong. For those that now Slocs it would not happen.

---

FT....I'm loathe to engage in any conversation with yourself on this topic but can you please give me a full explanation as to what your mate Slocs and SSCC would have done at 8/90 chasing 251 needing points to play finals?

 

I know 1 thing the bloods would have done different. Got those 2nd innings runs

-- Edited by 2 OLD 2 SLOW on Tuesday 2nd of March 2010 02:01:20 PM

Stocky Stumper wrote:

---

fathertime wrote:

---

i know what you meant Brett ...i was just been a smartass.

And no i do not agree with you. It may seem to outsiders that we are taking the high moral ground and people again from outside beleive we would've done the same thing if in the same posistion.....wrong. For those that now Slocs it would not happen.

---

FT....I'm loathe to engage in any conversation with yourself on this topic but can you please give me a full explanation as to what your mate Slocs and SSCC would have done at 8/90 chasing 251 needing points to play finals?

 

---

Stocky I thought you were smarter than this. Clearly this is the whole point. Who knows what we would have done (although I have my thoughts)? The point needs to be asked:

a) do we want this type of situation occuring (what do people think I am throwing it out there and I can see both sides

b) if we don't then what can we do about it

Yes we will be accused of sooking and we are bigger enough to cop that on the chin. But surely the debate this issue has caused is proof enough that in the very least it needs to be discussed, so that there is no ambiguity, no grey area and everyone knows where they stand. The DDCA wants issues clubs fell are important to be brought to their attention by the clubs. We think this issue is important so we are bringing it to their attention (like I have been asked to do, by the way).

On the seperate issue of pitches I think we as a collective should work harder at ensuring the quality of pitches produced is the best it can possibly be. How we do that? I have no farking idea, but once again we are prepared to raise it as an issue.

Did we seek legl advice, well we explored all options. Did we seriously consider them all, clearly not.

 

Stocky Stumper wrote:

---

fathertime wrote:

---

i know what you meant Brett ...i was just been a smartass.

And no i do not agree with you. It may seem to outsiders that we are taking the high moral ground and people again from outside beleive we would've done the same thing if in the same posistion.....wrong. For those that now Slocs it would not happen.

---

FT....I'm loathe to engage in any conversation with yourself on this topic but can you please give me a full explanation as to what your mate Slocs and SSCC would have done at 8/90 chasing 251 needing points to play finals?

 

place  a bet  with a  tab sport  to win the flag  next   season .

 

G Train wrote:

---

I must admit I cringed when i read the bit about legal action...

---

i thought u wernt commenting

 

i'm stupid. why not jarrod?

G Train wrote:

---

Because I don't want to sound like i'm having a go at you blokes too much over this whole issue Slocs. Hence, i won't comment too strongly about the letter.

---

OK don't use G Train . use Hoff... tell us how you feel ? 

 

train this is a forum that allows debates to be had and not that everybody should agree with everybody else, so why dont you say what you really think