Legal Aid wrote:

---

 

sheepy wrote:

---

Mate that is the biggest wanker response ever.
I would have thought with your so called legal background that you would understand the idea
of two sided argument and the right of facing your accuser.
There are no rules here pal but the fact is that those who choose to hide their identity are less respected than those who are prepared to voice opinions out in the open.

---

Other than the forum guys (slocs, G-Train, Fridge, Coatails) whose names or photos give their identity away, I have no idea who anyone is. For all I know, we may be from the same club...I certainly dont lose any sleep over worrying who people may or may not be. My opinions are just that, my opinions. Who cares? Well it appears some do and some may think Im just full of ****..Oh well...

 

 

---

Alot of people on here go under there nicknames, obviously i am Brett Ernst, Goochy-Paul Goodchild, Ringo-Kev Van Twest, Champ-Benny aruman the list goes on. My point is that you can still have a knick name or a anonymous photo but you are judged by your how you portray yourself. the above names who have been mentioned at no stage have made a point of trying to hide there identity. They have always let all and sundry know who they are.

At the moment though you raise some good arguments and opinions most won't care to respond or bother with you until you put your real name to your work. It is just how most like to operate, most want to know who they are talking too.