so what happens when sscc money drys up and you cant pay out the big bucks? do you think it would be fair then?

that is my ? will your thoughts be the same.

Im pointing out that a club that has money now like sscc may not have the same opinion if there revenue sources disappear.  

All the people going on about weather a club has money or not on here and last night are missing the bloody point...........

If it was about who has money and who doesn't we would keep the salary cap.

This system does not make for a level playing field, so what is the point of it ????

BErnst wrote:

---

Sir raising some very good points and Slocs tip toeing around answering as usual

---

what good points has sir raised peckerhead?

I didn't mean that to sound like "I couldn't give a fcuk what you reckon" cos it kinda did when I read it back ! You know what I mean, I welcome all opinion.....

i think there needs to be a system, what that is I dont know. But I would hope that clubs are working with the ddca to find a solution not just shoot them down when they present an alternative system.

I don't think so Brett. That would mean you would have to use more 'home grown' players in your side, which probably means not fielding the best possible side you can.

If you want a true level playing field it is gauranteed to also dilute the strength of the comp (Turf 1 inparticular).

I have really though hard about this lately and I don't believe there should be a system in place just for the sake of it. I also cannot think of a system that is not flawed.

I honestly think it should just be wiped.

I also would like to know if there will be an 'off the record vote' held between points sytem and wipe rule 7 before it goes up against the existing rule 7. I'd hate for the system to be put to vote at the meeting and because half the clubs don't want it, it doesn't get passed and we are stuck with the farce we have now.........

BErnst wrote:

---

All of them!

Pres do you think it would make much of a difference if the total amount of points was reduced?
If so what would be a reasonable total?

---

his only point was that sscc are rolling in cash. why would you think that is a good point in this conversation?

sir wrote:

---

i know how much work he has put into it and its been a lot and as i said before im not saying its right but clubs need to work with them otherwise it will turn to ****t and it will be no fault of the ddca.

---

I absolutely understand how much time and effort has been put into this, to get it to this point. I truly don't want to just shoot it down for the sake of it. It was clear last night the people involved were extremely passionate about what they had come up with. If they can answer the following, with something remotely convincing i'll shut up about it, because I think I made it pretty clear in my first post in this topic........

What are we trying to achieve ? Equality.

Does this system achieve it ? No.

So, what is the point of it ?

We are basically making guidelines which allow clubs to go out and spend as much as they want, on as many players as they want, only limiting them too where they source said players !