Or do the ddca just say to all the clubs that have complained, get off your fat arse and go and find some sponsors then you may be able to attract quality players?

That's what i was getting at when i mentioned that open slather does not necessarily mean it'd be unfair, but it would definitely make it uneven. In saying that, it probably is easier for some clubs to make money than others.

BErnst wrote:

---

Sir raising some very good points and Slocs tip toeing around answering as usual

---

Just like when you face Will Carr i hear!

 

fathertime wrote:

---

the new propsed system does not reward loyal servants to the club......i do not beleive that a player who have played all his jnrs at a certain club and then all his seniors at the same club should be based as a person that has been at a club for 5 yrs. Under the new proposed system the two are judged the same.,

Jeff Thom from MMs is worth 1 pt but likewise Nick Bole Brown next year(5yrs) is also worth one pt........20 yrs at the one club has the same value as 5 yrs at the one club........not in my opinion. A person like JT should not be included in the system.

---

You should get a point for every year of service at your club and every side must have 100pts or more a game lol

 

sir wrote:

---

 

Or do the ddca just say to all the clubs that have complained, get off your fat arse and go and find some sponsors then you may be able to attract quality players?

 

---

Sir, u make it sound like we have some kind of sugar daddy tipping in unlimited funds thru our club, without knowing the ins and outs of all clubs , i would debate whether any committee would work as long and hard on fundraising and sponsorship than ours ,
Reading all the posts i am sensing that alot of your points (some valid ) is talking about us and our player payments.... Again,our recruiting committee work there backsides off all winter tryting to improve our club....
Its no secret that we dont have the depth in juniors such as all caseys clubs have  so would u prefer we just roll over and disappear or continue to work hard and push on to the best of our ability.....

Ps. i also have no answer as to what is the best case scenario....

 

Rocafella wrote:

---

 

BErnst wrote:

---

 

BErnst wrote:

---

Sir raising some very good points and Slocs tip toeing around answering as usual

---

Just like when you face Will Carr i hear!

 

---

And how many times did you face him Mr Sh*t for Brains

 

 

---

Not talking to you crumpet

 

Rocafella wrote:

---

Why dont you stop commenting on this competition, it doesnt concern you anymore.
When you played in it no one on here gave a Flying Fck on your opinon and we now value it even less

---

Well said from a man who has the need to read my post and reply to every single one of them. Obessions can't be hiding easly you will work out what to do about it, would it help if i gave you my Uk blog address there are even photos of me for you pull your little chinese wang over?

 

the persuader wrote:

---

sir wrote:

---

 

Or do the ddca just say to all the clubs that have complained, get off your fat arse and go and find some sponsors then you may be able to attract quality players?

 

---

Sir, u make it sound like we have some kind of sugar daddy tipping in unlimited funds thru our club, without knowing the ins and outs of all clubs , i would debate whether any committee would work as long and hard on fundraising and sponsorship than ours ,
Reading all the posts i am sensing that alot of your points (some valid ) is talking about us and our player payments.... Again,our recruiting committee work there backsides off all winter tryting to improve our club....
Its no secret that we dont have the depth in juniors such as all caseys clubs have  so would u prefer we just roll over and disappear or continue to work hard and push on to the best of our ability.....

Ps. i also have no answer as to what is the best case scenario....

 

---

Not all Q,

 

Let put it this way, for all clubs that do work hard and have a good sponsorship base like sscc can afford to pay out some ok money. My question to slocs was that if he played at a club that did not have a good sponsorship base would his opinion of it being open slather still be the same. IMO I dont believe it would be.  

 

Who asked u , u obeist buffoon