Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: The Ashes


Status: Offline
Posts: 193
Date:
RE: The Ashes
Permalink Closed


In other words you are "SOFT"

One minute you say "i havent even got out of 1st gear" then your protesting to Slocs, next you are abandoning the forum and now you hide behind internet protocol as a form of defence.... again i say what is wrong with you Mr Western Star....... soft as butter

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 3330
Date:
Permalink Closed

I meant you need to think about who has your IP address you imbecilic fck.

__________________

MMCC wont be the same again!


Status: Offline
Posts: 193
Date:
Permalink Closed

i know exactly who has it "Western Star"

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 266
Date:
Permalink Closed

The Goblin wrote:

In other words you are "SOFT"

One minute you say "i havent even got out of 1st gear" then your protesting to Slocs, next you are abandoning the forum and now you hide behind internet protocol as a form of defence.... again i say what is wrong with you Mr Western Star....... soft as butter



hmmm that's interesting

 



__________________
TONIGHT, TONIGHT.   the best of the best...... the champ of the champ


Status: Offline
Posts: 573
Date:
Permalink Closed

What changes will be made for the next test? From Australia's point of view surely Johnson will have to make way for Bollinger? You can't have a bowler of his quality sitting in the wings when a front liner is not doing his job. He is obviously proven and can't weaken the bowling depth in any way. Does North get spelled and if so, for who? Clarke one more go or is he safe no matter what?
From the Poms point of view maybe The Pom, Fridge, Player Agent or Goochy might be in a position to comment further on their changes, if any. Australia can get stronger and hopefully the Poms can't. Roll on Adelaide.


__________________

How do you know if you've got memory loss???



Status: Offline
Posts: 119
Date:
Permalink Closed

England entered this test series knowing who there best 11 players are, they have remarkable amount of belief in there side as do the selectors and this reflects in there camp...........were Australia on the other hand are screwed! selectors have no idea what the best line up is, they talk of changes but i don't think they have the courage to go into test 1 and come out with a draw to make a change, they got heavily scrutinised for bringing in Doherty and would be massively scruitinised if they dropped him, it would almost be like admitting they got it wrong.
Clarke will not be dropped, only make way if he is inj, North well probably time to go but has got a history of when the chips are down he comes out and makes 100. And Johnson well he is half the player he used to be, no consistantcy, no swing, no zip, no bounce. But in the past has turned test matches on it's head and the selectors know that, the end of the day the selectors struggle to have the balls to drop players when there in the side and the reality is Australia drew the test so i can't see the selectors panacking even though they may be slightly concerned.

So No changes to either side unless injury strikes, perhaps Clarke for Kawaja as we all know!
Siddle is safe, Hilfy well the selectors like him and i am sure they want the rug in too but can only see it at Johnsons exspense.........do theyt have the balls to do it??

__________________
IMG THE PLACE TO BE!


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

Panasar in for swan, swan is farking sh1t

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

johnson must be dropped, hes lost his mojo with ball and bat. 6 ducks in his last 12 knocks and his bowling is terrible, all over the place he is........ must make room for dougie. that will be the only change the aussies should make imo. harris 12th man and johnson back to WA.

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 3330
Date:
Permalink Closed

You must have quite a side to consider dropping Clarke!

Your batting wasn't the problem in this test.

Is Player Agent Beaver?

__________________

MMCC wont be the same again!


Status: Offline
Posts: 119
Date:
Permalink Closed

Goochy wrote:

You must have quite a side to consider dropping Clarke!

Your batting wasn't the problem in this test.

Is Player Agent Beaver?



Goochy never mentioned anything about dropping Clarke, just mentioned replacing him for Kawaja if he is injured!

 



__________________
IMG THE PLACE TO BE!


Status: Offline
Posts: 1043
Date:
Permalink Closed

Get Dave Hussey in just for the ashes series, fck blooding the kids in this series, this is the fkn ashes, then by all means blood some kids v NZ, West indies etc, besides the fact not one young player has put his hand up when you could almost taste your test debut,
i would back D Hussey in for 2 tons if he played the last 4 tests bowls handy offies gun slipper and a great team man , everything North isnt....

PS. i tell you what, that young Maddinson from NSW looks a little ripper 18yo and already tearing up shield cricket , we could do worse than picking a smoky if they were gunna go down that path

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1043
Date:
Permalink Closed

Goochy wrote:

You must have quite a side to consider dropping Clarke!

Your batting wasn't the problem in this test.

Is Player Agent Beaver?



Clarke is a star test cricketer, only wont play if fails fitness....

 



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 119
Date:
Permalink Closed

the persuader wrote:

Get Dave Hussey in just for the ashes series, fck blooding the kids in this series, this is the fkn ashes, then by all means blood some kids v NZ, West indies etc, besides the fact not one young player has put his hand up when you could almost taste your test debut,
i would back D Hussey in for 2 tons if he played the last 4 tests bowls handy offies gun slipper and a great team man , everything North isnt....

PS. i tell you what, that young Maddinson from NSW looks a little ripper 18yo and already tearing up shield cricket , we could do worse than picking a smoky if they were gunna go down that path



Ha ha quote 'fck blooding the kids in this series' then 2 secs later 'Maddinson from NSW looks a little ripper 18yo and already tearing up shield cricket , we could do worse than picking a smoky if they were gunna go down that path'

Haaaaaaaa good work jase lol

 



__________________
IMG THE PLACE TO BE!
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

interesting stat just for you tiger:
North averages 6.92 when he comes to the crease with Australia's total under 150,

-- Edited by sir on Monday 29th of November 2010 08:22:40 PM

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 1043
Date:
Permalink Closed

Player Agent wrote:

 

the persuader wrote:

Get Dave Hussey in just for the ashes series, fck blooding the kids in this series, this is the fkn ashes, then by all means blood some kids v NZ, West indies etc, besides the fact not one young player has put his hand up when you could almost taste your test debut,
i would back D Hussey in for 2 tons if he played the last 4 tests bowls handy offies gun slipper and a great team man , everything North isnt....

PS. i tell you what, that young Maddinson from NSW looks a little ripper 18yo and already tearing up shield cricket , we could do worse than picking a smoky if they were gunna go down that path



Ha ha quote 'fck blooding the kids in this series' then 2 secs later 'Maddinson from NSW looks a little ripper 18yo and already tearing up shield cricket , we could do worse than picking a smoky if they were gunna go down that path'

Haaaaaaaa good work jase lol

 

 



Beaver, if u look closely , i said "IF" they go down this path of playing kids , his form is very strong at the moment

 



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 3330
Date:
Permalink Closed

Player Agent wrote:

Goochy wrote:

You must have quite a side to consider dropping Clarke!

Your batting wasn't the problem in this test.

Is Player Agent Beaver?



Goochy never mentioned anything about dropping Clarke, just mentioned replacing him for Kawaja if he is injured!

 



Who said I was talking to you?

 



__________________

MMCC wont be the same again!


Status: Offline
Posts: 3187
Date:
Permalink Closed

Goochy wrote:

You must have quite a side to consider dropping Clarke!

Your batting wasn't the problem in this test.

Is Player Agent Beaver?



Yes

 



__________________



Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

Lrq

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 2333
Date:
Permalink Closed

surely clarke wont be playing. There's no way he was right either batting or fielding. Obviously couldnt bowl as he would've if fit in englands 2 innings. Expect someone else to replace him. If we play an unfit Clarke the selectors are idiots.

__________________

G Train enjoys puffing his chest out and strutting around in his chookpen like Foghorn Leghorn..



Status: Offline
Posts: 3187
Date:
Permalink Closed

He hardly bowls at all these days anyway FT.

__________________

«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6  >  Last»  | Page of 6  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard