Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
"The Bloods" Cricket Chat Forum -> DDCA News -> St Marys v Berwick
Post Info TOPIC: St Marys v Berwick
Number_1_Scorer


Status: Offline
Posts: 133
Date:
St Marys v Berwick
Permalink Closed

According to mycricket it says result disputed. What happened there?

__________________
Get the Red Ink out.
ExElpres


Status: Offline
Posts: 214
Date:
Permalink Closed

Word on the street has it that to follow on you have to be 80 runs in front or over 80 runs in front. Discussion ensued.........

__________________
I don't play cricket anymore....
ExElpres


Status: Offline
Posts: 214
Date:
Permalink Closed

I've been told the umpire said because they werent over 80 in front (they were exactly 80 in front) they couldn't make St Marys follow on. Funny that the rules say "Not less than 80". Unless im mistaken, the umpire may have royally f@#ked this one in the arse...........

__________________
I don't play cricket anymore....
ExElpres


Status: Offline
Posts: 214
Date:
Permalink Closed

Be interesting to see what happens this week...........



-- Edited by ExElpres on Sunday 19th of December 2010 07:58:15 AM

__________________
I don't play cricket anymore....
Mrs Slocombe


Status: Offline
Posts: 11
Date:
Permalink Closed

the umpires first game after xmas should be U11's on Friday night !! right Craig ?

__________________

l Love my boy " Craig "
prince mark


Status: Offline
Posts: 3187
Date:
Permalink Closed

A miss calculation from the white coats cost HSD an outright yesterday. Short changed 8 overs.....

__________________

slocs


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

please explain

__________________
snakepit


Status: Offline
Posts: 159
Date:
Permalink Closed

Due to wet outfield we started play at 2.50. 30 overs were deducted due to 110 mins lost. Apparently that should have only been 80 mins due to 30mins being able to be made up.

-- Edited by snakepit on Sunday 19th of December 2010 06:46:12 PM

__________________
slocs


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

hmmmm

__________________
fathertime


Status: Offline
Posts: 2333
Date:
Permalink Closed

The scorecard looked terrible Prince/Hammo....where they really that bad?

__________________

G Train enjoys puffing his chest out and strutting around in his chookpen like Foghorn Leghorn..
snakepit


Status: Offline
Posts: 159
Date:
Permalink Closed

We bowled well and caught everything but the batting wasn't up to scratch. Not going to sit here and bag them. I'm not saying anything the Maranatha players havent said themselves.

__________________
G Train


Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

What happened on Saturday was a farking joke. No disrespect to the saints but a major fark up by those officiating cost us a certain outright. Who knows how that could effect things at the end of the year.

I'll be very disappointed if i see either of those two umpires officiating in Turf 1 matches post Christmas.

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!
slocs


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

What happened train?

__________________
prince mark


Status: Offline
Posts: 3187
Date:
Permalink Closed

Train, I find it very hard to believe that John Kristy made a mistake. He used to umpire Premier Cricket you know...........

__________________

G Train


Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

Slocs, we bowled St Mary's out for 33 and weren't allowed to enforce the follow on.

Prince, I've never come across a bloke with such a vast knowledge of all facets of the game. He even knows how to remove St Mary's covers better than Cashy and his old man thats how good he is.

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!
sheepy


Status: Offline
Posts: 584
Date:
Permalink Closed

Good effort by st mary's to get covers down considering the state of the game. Must have been tempting not too with so many other grounds not getting theirs down.

__________________

TIGER IS THE ORIGINAL JOEL MONAGHAN. (Well at least the 25% i met last night.)
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

sheepy wrote:

Good effort by st mary's to get covers down considering the state of the game. Must have been tempting not too with so many other grounds not getting theirs down.


yes it was.

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
slocs


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

So you would consider it if you were in that position sheep?

__________________
Woofa


Status: Offline
Posts: 1845
Date:
Permalink Closed

Maybe they could have helped mordi get theirs on

__________________
G Train


Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

Are you fair dinkum Sheepy? I don't mean to sound harsh here but they don't need to be commended for just doing what is right do they? I don't understand how it could have been tempting to leave them off? St.Mary's are a proud club and so are the Cashman family, I would say it never even entered there minds to sabotage a result.

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!
1 2 3  >  Last»  | Page of 3  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
"The Bloods" Cricket Chat Forum -> DDCA News -> St Marys v Berwick
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard