Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Turf 1 final four.


Status: Offline
Posts: 1004
Date:
RE: Turf 1 final four.
Permalink Closed


slocs wrote:

first slip. great catch by the pom.




 Did one of the Berwick boys Grass Ayresy at 1st slip?



__________________

miss_reef_bikini05-1.jpg?t=1247200064



Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

Not many would've got a hand on it Sobers...

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!



Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

Most would of eaten it....

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 1004
Date:
Permalink Closed

I think Slocs should declare, get Berwick to set us a target and then be all out swinging, That would leave SSCC and Berwick 2nd and 3rd and Parkfield and Buckley to play off in the 1st vs 4th final. Berwick had a bad day Saturday but I think both teams are evenly matched.

__________________

miss_reef_bikini05-1.jpg?t=1247200064



Status: Offline
Posts: 1004
Date:
Permalink Closed

Oh I'm sure Berwick would then return the favour and not put in for a home Semi.

__________________

miss_reef_bikini05-1.jpg?t=1247200064



Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

sir wrote:

based on the position of current games, ladder going into last rd:

buck 51
sscc 45 (maybe 49p with outright)
park 43
ber 39
dov 33
nth d 27

last rd fixture:

26 Feb, 5 MarNorth Dandenong  v  ParkfieldLois Twohig Reserve 1  View
26 Feb, 5 MarDandenong West  v  DovetonGreaves Reserve 1  View
26 Feb, 5 MarBerwick  v  KeysboroughArch Brown Reserve  View
26 Feb, 5 MarBuckley Ridges  v  Hallam Kalora ParkPark Oval  View
26 Feb, 5 MarNarre Warren  v  Springvale SouthSweeney Reserve 1  View
27 Feb, 6 MarMordialloc  v  St MarysCarroll Reserve 2  View


Looking at that Sir, a total washout this Saturday would be handy for us even though we've already lost. Would leave us 9 points clear with one to play, meaning we'd have to lose and either Doveton or Nth Dandy win outright.

Funnier things have happened though...

 



__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!



Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

slocs wrote:

Most would of eaten it....



It was never going to cost us though...

 



__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!



Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

Nobody was thinking that train you're being silly

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

???

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!



Status: Offline
Posts: 1004
Date:
Permalink Closed

Facebooking at 1st slip?

__________________

miss_reef_bikini05-1.jpg?t=1247200064

sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

thegoblin99 wrote:

Sir,

i agree with Slocs that Dalzotto looked raw and i would say a tad out of his depth. I'm not potting the young bloke though, i want to stress that.

I would like to know why Cam wasn't introduced into the attack before SS passed the score? Runs were precious and ensuring an end was tied up would have been handy

-- Edited by thegoblin99 on Tuesday 15th of February 2011 08:41:46 AM



maybe train can answer that, but with only 50 odd on the board not sure it would've mattered.

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

thegoblin99 wrote:

Sir,

i agree with Slocs that Dalzotto looked raw and i would say a tad out of his depth. I'm not potting the young bloke though, i want to stress that.

I would like to know why Cam wasn't introduced into the attack before SS passed the score? Runs were precious and ensuring an end was tied up would have been handy

-- Edited by thegoblin99 on Tuesday 15th of February 2011 08:41:46 AM



this may be the case but he''ll learn from playing in our 1's rather then our 2's. hes only a kid and will get stronger and smarter as he learns the game.

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

Yeah we know he's raw, but it's a good experience for him to bowl against these sorts of players. He'll learn pretty quickly where not to bowl that's for sure.

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!



Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

He'll be ok no worries.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

sir wrote:

thegoblin99 wrote:

Sir,

i agree with Slocs that Dalzotto looked raw and i would say a tad out of his depth. I'm not potting the young bloke though, i want to stress that.

I would like to know why Cam wasn't introduced into the attack before SS passed the score? Runs were precious and ensuring an end was tied up would have been handy

-- Edited by thegoblin99 on Tuesday 15th of February 2011 08:41:46 AM



maybe train can answer that, but with only 50 odd on the board not sure it would've mattered.

 



It's a fair question from the Goblin but our captain isn't a contributor to this forum and I don't think he even reads it, so i certainly don't want to be answering any questions on his behalf or slagging him off for making the wrong calls either. I'm sure he knows what he's doing and there'd be reasons behind whatever decision he makes.

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!



Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

Get the splinters out of your poo poo hole train. Sitting on the fence and talking like a politican doesnt suit you buddy.

__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT



Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

Get stuffed dishonestbobs! Quite clearly i'm saying that I can't answer that question on my captains behalf and if you think i'm going to slag him off on here then you've got rocks in your head! We stick together us berwick boys, unlike some others.

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!



Status: Offline
Posts: 227
Date:
Permalink Closed

Train, i respect your answer and i'm not asking you to belt the skipper. In between viewing the game and watching Lefty talk to the Booths, Slocs and the over rated Walton i couldnt help but think the game was crying out for Mc Donnell.

I even saw Doogs pacing up and down faster than ever and i know he was thinking is was mighty time for his boy to launch a few down. Not for one minute am i saying the game result could have been changed

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

thegoblin99 wrote:

Train, i respect your answer and i'm not asking you to belt the skipper. In between viewing the game and watching Lefty talk to the Booths, Slocs and the over rated Walton i couldnt help but think the game was crying out for Mc Donnell.

I even saw Doogs pacing up and down faster than ever and i know he was thinking is was mighty time for his boy to launch a few down. Not for one minute am i saying the game result could have been changed



well theres your answer then. obviously the skipper thought the quicks were more of a chance of getting wickets.

 50 odd runs is not much to play with.



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 1266
Date:
Permalink Closed

Gee whiz train, dont be so defensive. I think by saying you wouldnt slag him of on here means you actually thought some changes were warranted.

__________________

Im cooler than cool, Im SCRAT

«First  <  1 2 3 4 5 6 7  >  Last»  | Page of 7  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard