Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Turf 2 top 4


Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
RE: Turf 2 top 4
Permalink Closed


haha

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!

sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

What about my point that some A grade sides should be in turf 5? because they are better then some turf 5 sides.

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

Are you fair dinkum?

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!

sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

yes.

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 3187
Date:
Permalink Closed

You could go down every grade and say that Sir

__________________



Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

Well for starters, A Grade is played on synthetic and Turf 5 is played on Turf.

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!

sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

you could prince, just shows the current system has flaws.

Particularly turf 5 / A grade.



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

G Train wrote:

Well for starters, A Grade is played on synthetic and Turf 5 is played on Turf.



so, you're stated teams are playing where they should be, this not the case.

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 214
Date:
Permalink Closed

I want to see Trains system implemented next season !

Sorry Sir, your theory is ridiculous. A team can win the flag in T3 and get relegated, that year ? Spare me..............

__________________
I don't play cricket anymore....
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

ExElpres wrote:

I want to see Trains system implemented next season !

Sorry Sir, your theory is ridiculous. A team can win the flag in T3 and get relegated, that year ? Spare me..............



ok i understand that part may not work, but i still believe that 1s play 1s and 2s play 2s.

 



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 214
Date:
Permalink Closed

I like the sounds of that too, but its not like footy where you can rock up and watch both games etc. I don't think it really matters if your grades are all playing different opponents.......

It also means plenty of sides will be playing above/below where they should be, just because of the position their ones find themselves in.

Imagine winning the flag every year but can't go up cos your ones are junk or winning the spoon every year but can't go down cos your ones are awesome !

The mob winning Turf 4 every year would be ropable if the **** team in T3's ones, were just middle of the road !

__________________
I don't play cricket anymore....


Status: Offline
Posts: 1004
Date:
Permalink Closed

I didn't like this topic , so I didn't read it

__________________

miss_reef_bikini05-1.jpg?t=1247200064



Status: Offline
Posts: 103
Date:
Permalink Closed

So Sir,

You are suggesting that a side which has a Turf 3 side as its firsts elevates it's A grade side to Turf 5 and get beaten outright each match thereby losing possibly eleven cricketers from the competition because they can't compete.

As far as good A Grade cricketers are concerned when they bowl on Turf they will be bowling with a ball that doesn't swing as much or batting on a pitch that does a lot more. There is a fair difference between Turf and Synthetic cricket, These are just two of the more important ones. Clubs at the beginning of each year nminate their sides and can request a different grade to the one they are playing in.


Under your plan there would be T1 and reserves T3 and reserves. How do you elevate and relegate sides that are obviously not up to the grade or are too good for their grade.

__________________

I thunk I hadd a misspelt youth



Status: Offline
Posts: 573
Date:
Permalink Closed

thegoblin99 wrote:

The current system equalises the competition anyway. If a Turf 1 club is strong enough to have Turf 2 then good luck to them. This allows junior development and lessons the gap bringing players into Turf 1.

The same applies for Turf 2 sides. If their 2nds are capable of playing Turf 3 they deserve to do so, once again the gap is reduced when bringing players up. Clubs can  use their 2nds to develop kids and control the cycle of ageing first 11s

This forms a natural player retention / replacement programme



Spot on. Case closed.

 



__________________

How do you know if you've got memory loss???



Status: Offline
Posts: 227
Date:
Permalink Closed

Final post for me on this.

Everyone assumes that playing on turf means that the standard is better than synthetic. IMO this is not always the case as the smart clubs fill their 2nd turf side up with kids as a form of retention and development. We have to do this because District cricket grabs our youth sometimes just to fill the 4ths

Somtimes an A grade side could beat a low grade turf side because it has older players but this has no relevance

This year coz of the big wet we start to forget the value of 80 over cricket. There are enough forms of 1 day cricket at the minute. Playing as many 80 over games as possible is vital.

Last point--- Is there any value in the bottom 2 sides being relegated and the 2 grand finalists coming up from T2?



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 3330
Date:
Permalink Closed

We.don't.play.80.over.cricket.and.we've.beat.you.in.three.out.of.four.ashes.

It.is.****.cricket.IMO

__________________

MMCC wont be the same again!


Status: Offline
Posts: 35
Date:
Permalink Closed

the best 2 sides i have played in turf 2 this year are hsd and cranny in my opinion

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 536
Date:
Permalink Closed

Darrel Hair wrote:

So Sir,

You are suggesting that a side which has a Turf 3 side as its firsts elevates it's A grade side to Turf 5 and get beaten outright each match thereby losing possibly eleven cricketers from the competition because they can't compete.

As far as good A Grade cricketers are concerned when they bowl on Turf they will be bowling with a ball that doesn't swing as much or batting on a pitch that does a lot more. There is a fair difference between Turf and Synthetic cricket, These are just two of the more important ones. Clubs at the beginning of each year nminate their sides and can request a different grade to the one they are playing in.


Under your plan there would be T1 and reserves T3 and reserves. How do you elevate and relegate sides that are obviously not up to the grade or are too good for their grade.



           Cmon Darrel
 
           At the upper grades of course your right but there are plenty of A grade
           boys running around in club Thirds that have played a lot of turf cricket
           and know what a 4 piece looks like. I know of a bloke that moved clubs and 
           is now playing turf 5 and was in our synthetic 2nds.So dont try and tell me
           boys playing at a strong club without access to a 2nd turf ground couldnt 
           compete with clubs that do in turf 5 . 

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 61
Date:
Permalink Closed

I had just written something similar pringles but you beat me to it, darrel's theory is confusing. harder to bowl cause the ball wont do much but yet harder to bat cause the pitch will do more?
Id be more than happy to back Sir's a grade side against some of the turf 5 sides on any surface.

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 536
Date:
Permalink Closed

exactly jaa

Not just talking sirs team either Buckley A grade and a couple of others  

-- Edited by PRINGLES on Tuesday 8th of February 2011 07:31:30 PM

__________________
«First  <  15 6 7 8  >  Last»  | Page of 8  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard