Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: 1st Test team


Status: Offline
Posts: 551
Date:
1st Test team
Permalink Closed


Australia's team for the first Test against the Yarpies isn't looking as settled and assured as the scribes would have us believe.

With Watto likely to bat at 5, the opening pair remains problematic. warner hasn't batted for a while and cowan hasn't been able to go on with a long innings.

Clarke, Ponting, Watto and M. Hussey are shoe-ins as the middle order.

Wade should have the w/k job but you never know with NSW using its bullying power to get Haddin back (despite what Clarke says publicaly).

Then comes the problem with the bowling sub-team. Lyon hasn't show he is likely to take more than a couple of wickets, let alone win a game.

Starc is the only firm quick as he has form and brings the left-armers angle (and bounce) to the table. Most pundits (especially Victorian) have Siddle and Pattinson as the other quicks but their combined figures of 1 for almost 200 (ok, 1-188) hardly instils great hope despite the damage they caused to a demoralised, disjointed and ill-disciplined WA team.

Anyone care to name their team for the first Test?



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

Cowan, Warner, Watson, Clarke, Ponting, m Hussey, wade, Siddle, j pattinson, starc , Lyon.

__________________
sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

thats a safe bet slocs, ill go the same.



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 551
Date:
Permalink Closed

Squad for Test series against the Yarpies that starts at the Gabba on Friday week (followed by Tests at the Adelaide Oval (November 22-26) and the WACA in Perth (November 30-December 4), is: M. Clarke (capt), D. Warner, E. Cowan, S. Watson, R. Ponting, M. Hussey, M. Wade, P. Siddle, B. Hilfenhaus, M. Starc, J. Pattinson, and N. Lyon.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

I already posted it

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 152
Date:
Permalink Closed

starc wont play .

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

stop it david

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

Starc is a certainty. Down to Lyon or Hilfy but you'd reckon they'll stick with a recognised spinner with Watto being in the side. I would.

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!

sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

i would love to have watto open and we find another middle order bat, but he will be very handy at 5 or 6. hopefully openers can look after punter, pup, watto and huss.



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 551
Date:
Permalink Closed

well, well, watto's calf causes him to leave the field in his first over? even if scans clear him, can Australia's X factor player be risked for 1st Test? and punter's finger? won't it be a juicy target for messrs styne and morkel? a fine mess on the eve of a tough campaign. odds firming by the minute for yarpies.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 3756
Date:
Permalink Closed

told ya's starc wouldn't play.....

__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 4528
Date:
Permalink Closed

Ha! A lot changed when Watto went out.

__________________

LRQ - Laughing Really Quietly. Get on it!



Status: Offline
Posts: 551
Date:
Permalink Closed

lunch on first day. starc should have played. would have attcked stumps/body more than siddle, who keeps bowling a line that amla and petersen don't have to play. wasted.



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 573
Date:
Permalink Closed

Iron, I watched most of todays play on the radio whilst driving around hence I didn't see the first session at all. However I was frustrated to learn that we had a 4-5 field early in the play hoping for leg side dismissals to a "plan" more than trying for knicks and catches by driving which would allow for a more attacking field. New ball, new wicket. Simple I'd have thought. It seems the attempted knowledge, simple yet effective, that Craig McDermott tried to impart on our bowlers and captain over his tenure was lost - aim for the top of off with swing and set an agressive field. If they drive you through the field you cop it....better than being worked around the corner or played through square.
We'll never know whether with Starc if the Yarpies would be 3 fa (I'm happy with Siddle playing, no drama). I think we should have gone agressive first rather than being cute. Poor field placements means bowlers are compromised which = opporunities for batsman.
That's me.

__________________

How do you know if you've got memory loss???



Status: Offline
Posts: 551
Date:
Permalink Closed

Iron, I watched most of todays play on the radio whilst driving ...

Very nice Rock. Obviously commentators did a good job accurately describing Hilfindunny and sids bowling wrong line on either side of the wicket respectively. young patto was the best of an unsuccessful trio. so much for the stupid alleged dossier. whoever wrote it should get the flick. You're quite right. back to basics; quicks aim to hit top of off stump, set field accordingly and plug away like McGrath used to.

But horse has bolted and it's going to be an uphill job for our bats to save this Test.

still maintain form bowler starc should have been in, given the difference he offered from an all right-arm battery. 



__________________


Status: Offline
Posts: 573
Date:
Permalink Closed

I don't think Starc plays infront of Haus, Patto or Sids in this test. 6pm today may suggest he could of but I don't blame the sellectors for allowing the punters to think this. Either the coach, skipper or both must take responsibility for today's first session for the lack of mongrel and intent which one would normally expect fom the first session of a quality test series.

__________________

How do you know if you've got memory loss???



Status: Offline
Posts: 573
Date:
Permalink Closed

Is it true spin was used well before the sanga's were called? Not sure.... just askin.

__________________

How do you know if you've got memory loss???

sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

yes



__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.


Status: Offline
Posts: 573
Date:
Permalink Closed

Mazz, WELL before or last 15 mins or so?

__________________

How do you know if you've got memory loss???

sir


Status: Offline
Posts: 2136
Date:
Permalink Closed

Well before, maybe 45 or so, I thought at the time its early.

__________________
what sir wants, sir gets.
1 2  >  Last»  | Page of 2  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard